IN THIS ISSUE
December 2004 Home Page
Vaccum of natural heritage
India 2004
Money Mantra
Society Today 
Shams-Planet Earth 2004
Kashmiri Samiti
Jagadguru Shankaracharya
Heal the world
The New Year and Resolutions
Happy New Year 2005
 
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

HIM VIKAS ISSUES
ALL SUBMISSIONS
PRESENT ISSUE
BACK ISSUES

TRANSLATE THIS PAGE NOW



ADVERTISE WITH US



Voted Shimla's TOP HOTEL, offering clients the best in hospitality and services. Visit us for a memorable and comfortable stay. Opposite Tourism Lift, The Mall, Shimla,
HOTEL COMBERMERE


India's No.1 Matrimonial site. SHAADI.COM. Join today.

Voted one of the Leading Website Development & Design Firms in New Delhi, India. An Award winning studio, dedicated to high-quality, high-impact, creative communication solutions.
EEVISIONS
www.eevisions.com

It is the newspapers at the grass-root level which NAI represents. Our role is not only to sustain and strengthen democracy, but also in building the nation.
Newspapers Association of India
www.naiindia.org




Web Awards Won



Newspapers Association
of India Member



KASHMIRI SAMITI - NEW DELHI DECLARATION
Attended by Rohit Mehta and
Rajesh Khanna, as special invitees.

By Sunil Shakdher
President

Forwarded by Anoop Kaul
Advisor-Media
Sunil Shakdher

KASHMIRI PANDITS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2004

FRIDAY, DECEMBER 24, 2004

Today the Hindus of Kashmir are standing on the crossroad of history. It will not be out of place to mention that today the Hindus and the other minorities of the entire State of Jammu and Kashmir, are also standing on the crossroads of history. The Hindus of Kashmir are reduced to the position of a surrogate people whose right to live and right to freedom is subject to the approval of the Muslim majority of the Jammu and Kashmir State. The peace process between India and the Jehadi groups in Kashmir and the negotiations for a peace- settlement with Pakistan have changed the entire context of the genocide of the Hindus in Kashmir. The time has come for the Hindu community of Kashmir, now smouldering in exile, to stand unitedly and decide whether it will accept the servitude of a Muslim state, which the secular state of India seeks to impose upon it. The Hindus of Kashmir inherited their freedom, as did the other people of India, from the dissolution of the British Indian enforce in 1947. The Hindus of Kashmir, therefore, have ah inalienable right to freedom, which the State of India cannot pawn to the Muslims, whether they are in Kashmir or in India or in Pakistan.

For the last fifty years of the Indian freedom the Hindus of Kashmir have borne the scourge of the Muslim dominance, genocide and humiliation in exile. !t is pertinent to note here that lakhs of Hindus abandoned their homes, during the last five decades, in a process of silent migration, forced upon them by political oppression, religious persecution, economic deprivation and poverty and social alienation. The time has come for the Hindus of Kashmir to expose the real character of the Muslim Jehad. The time has also come for them to expose the character of the Indian state. The time has come for the Hindus of Kashmir to ask the people of India whether they have created two separate freedoms one for themselves and the other for the Hindus of Kashmir, whether they have laid down to standards of secularism, one for the people of India and the other for the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir and whether they have given any mandate to the Indian State to establish Muslim hegemony over the Hindus and on the other minorities, the Sikhs and the Buddhists in the in the State of Jammu and Kashmir.


Muslim Jehad

Over the post Independence era of the Indian history incessant efforts have been made by the State Government as well as the Government of India to conceal the real character of the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir. Attempts have always been made to provide cover to the communal and fundamentalist content of the Muslim separatist movements in the State, right from the accession of the State to India in 1947. The various forms of Muslim separatist movement which ravaged the State during the last five decades have been camouflaged under the cover of autonomy, sub-nationalism, regional identity and even secularism. Sheer subterfuge has characterised the official as well as the non-official responses to the Muslim movements seeking the separation of the State from India and its unification with Pakistan. More often, the real dangers confronting the State and the Hindus and the other minorities have been overlooked by deliberate design and a policy which in the long run has helped the separatist forces to consolidate their strength and their hold on the Muslims of the State. Subtle efforts, coordinated at various levels, have always been put into process by the State Government as well as the Indian Government, and other interested quarters, to divert the attention of the Indian people, from the menacing threat posed to the security and the unity of the nation by the militarisation of pan-Islamic fundamentalism in South Asia, with its epicenter in Pakistan, and the militarisation of the Muslim secessionist forces in the State.

The Hindu community does not entertain any illusions about the real character of the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir.

The Hindu community has repeatedly stated that the war of attrition which is being waged in Jammu and Kashmir, is aimed to:-

(1). delink Jammu and Kashmir State from India and unite it with the Muslim state of Pakistan,
(2). eliminate the Hindus and other minorities in the State, and
(3). break up the traditional northern frontier of India to open the way for the expansion of the Muslim power into the north of India.

The Muslim jehad in Kashmir is a part of the ideological commitment of the pan-islamic fundamentalism, of which the Muslims of Jammu and Kashmir form an integral part. Since the Hindus in Kashmir have always been in the frontline of resistance against Muslim separatism, they faced the first assault of the Muslim Jehad. The Hindus of Kashmir are not the victims of the war attrition the Muslim Jehad has unfolded in the State. The genocide of the Hindus in Kashmir as well as Jammu is not incidental to the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir. The real truth is that the ethnic extermination of the Hindus forms an essential part of the agenda of the Muslim Jehad.

The Hindus are eliminated because :-
(1). they form the frontline of the resistance against the Muslim separatist movements in Kashmir;
(2). they do not accept that Kashmir forms a part of the Muslim nation of Pakistan;
(3). they oppose the reorganisation of the State on the basis of the religious precept and precedent of Islam;
(4). they oppose the Muslimisation of the government, society and the economic organisation of the State;
(5). they refuse to join the Jehad against India.


Indian State

The indian state has a history of having compromised on the basic principles of its national policy in dealing with the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir The Indian state has either not been able to identify the real character of the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir or it has deliberately refused to recognize it. From time to time the Indian state has accepted Muslim identity politics, Muslim secessionism, fundamentalisation of the Muslim society, and the Islamisation of the State, as an integral part of the Indian secular ethos.

The Indian state has so far refused to accept that:—

(1). genocide of Hindus was brought about by the onslaught of the militarised Jehadi forces in Kashmir;
(2). the Muslim Jehad is a negation of the secular basis of the Indian society;
(3). the Hindus have a title to live in Kashmir in their own right as the minorities live in the other States of India and their right to live in Kashmir is not subject to the approval and the good will of the Muslim majority of the State;
(4). the Hindus have an equal right to determine the future disposition of the State;
(5). no clandestine and partial political settlement with the Jehadi groups or the Muslims in Kashmir which does not recognize the territorial and political claims of the Hindus will be acceptable to them;
(6). The Hindus of Kashmir can not be consigned to the slavery of a Muslim state or forced, to subject themselves to the imperatives of law, which does not form a part of the Constitution of India and which deprives them of the freedom, liberty and right to equality, which the people in India are guaranteed.

The Indian State class continues to harbour a number of mistaken notions, either out of its high sense of self-righteousness, or out of sheer ignorance about the Muslim separatist movements in the State. The Indian establishment still believes that the Muslim masses are not a factor in the military

operatives of the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir, (b) the Jehadi flanks do not have support bases in the Muslim population of the State and (c) the war of attrition being waged in the State is ideologically committed to sub-national aspirations for freedom in the form of autonomy or independence and permeated by a commitment to "Kashmiryat" The Indian establishment still believes that the militant operations in Kashmir are civil operations, which must be met with civil action. The Indian leadership still believes that ever after the genocide of hindus in Kashmir, the ethnic extermination of the Hindus in the Muslim majority districts of Jammu province, the exodus of hundreds of thousands of Hindus from their homes and the widespread destruction of the Hindu shrines and temples all over the State does not represent Muslim communalism and Muslim sectarianism.

The Indian state has exposed its character by its efforts, often abortive, to bargain with the Muslim Jehadi groups and the Muslim separatist forces, even at the cost of diluting the sovereignty of India and at the cost of the Hindus who constitute nearly 37 percent of the population of the State. The offer of autonomy, porus borders, demilitarisation of the Line of Control, etc. are the expressions of the readiness of the Indian state to surrender to the dictates of the Muslim separatist forces. The Indian state has gone so far as to open negotiations with Pakistan to reach a settlement with that country which is acceptable to the Muslims of the State. The Indian State accepts unabashedly, that Hindus are not a factor in the determination of the future disposition of the State. At no time has the Indian State sought to ascertain the will and the aspirations of the Hindus and the other minorities in the State. The Hindus of Kashmir are conscious of the fact that whatever settlement the Indian State reaches with the Muslim Jehad and Pakistan, the price will have to be paid by them.


Hindu Fraternity

Incessant efforts have been made all these years, more so in the recent past to perpetrate the myth that the exiled community is divided into self-centered factions each following its own agenda. This International Conference reiterates its considered opinion that there is no dissension in the community and its various expressions have a broad structure of common objectives, which underline :

(1). the reversal of the genocide;
Imp*-(2) The return of community to the land of its birth in a state of freedom which absolves them of the servitude to a Muslim state and which ensures them a separate geopolitical dispensation under a separate homeland.
(3). the declaration of the Hindus in exile as refugees under the International Convention for Refugees, in order to lift them up from the present state of poverty and destitution, unemployment and neglect which they have been exposed to during the last one and a half decades.


New Delhi Declaration

The International Conference cautions the Government of India against any mis step and any compromise with the Muslim Jehad in the name of the so called "peace process". The International Conference affirms its resolve to fight against any attempts the Indian State makes to reach a settlement with the Muslim Jehad or Pakistan which involves the dilution of the Indian sovereignty in the State. The International Conference firmly believes that the dilution of the Indian sovereignty in the State in the name of autonomy, porus borders, international protectorate, demilitarization of the Line of Control, etc. will eventually lead to the second partition of India.
The International Conference rejects the autonomy of the State under the banner of "Kashmiryat", which in effect, will lead to the endorsement of the exclusion of the State from the constitutional organisation of India and its Islamisation. The international Conference affirms its determination to oppose any settlement of the Government of India with the Muslim Jehad in Kashmir or Pakistan, which does not consider the territorial claims of the Hindus in Kashmir and perpetuates their exile.

The International Conference reaffirms the demand of the Hindus of Kashmir to a homeland constituted of the territory of the Kashmir province organized into a Centrally Administered Territory of India and governed by the Constitution of India.

The International Conference demands the declaration of Hindus of Kashmir, who were uprooted by the war of attrition in Kashmir in 1990, and who are now living in exile, as refugees under the international Convention for Refugees, till they are able to return to the land of their birth.

(Sunil Shakdher)
President

KASHMIRI SAMITI, DELHI (REGD.)
KASHMIRI BHAWAN,
KASHMIR BHAWAN MARG,
AMAR COLONY, LAJPAT NAGAR-IV,
NEW DELHI - 110024

Mobile : 9810060222
Fax No. 51625196

Anoop Kaul
Anoop Kaul
Advisor-Media
  

Join today. India's No. 1 Matrimonial Service.



Published Online by Rohit Mehta - Chief Executive Editor (I.T)

Designed & Maintained by EEVISIONS Email: webmaster@eevisions.com
Optimized for Internet Explorer 5.x. 1024x768. 32bit Colour.
Copyright © 2004 Academy of Hill Development Sciences. All rights reserved.


| Link to us | Subscribe | Advertisments | Donate |
| Email us | About us | Our Panel | Back Issues | Contact us |